See the bias in your news.
Your AI watchdog for objectivity.
How It Works — Live Example
“Claude: The headline uses the loaded verb 'dragging' (implying coercion/unwilling participation) and frames a complex geopolitical situation as a yes/no question, presenting an interpretation rather than a verifiable fact about whether paramilitaries are actually 'dragging' Iraq into conflict. | OpenAI: The headline uses the phrase 'dragging Iraq into the war,' which implies a negative action and evokes an emotional response, while also posing a question that suggests speculation about the motives of Iran-allied paramilitaries.”
Overall Rankings — Last 30 Days
Since Mar 29, 2026| # | Channel |
|---|---|
| 1 | BBC NewsUK 82 anti-Trump |
| 2 | Deutsche WelleGermany 78 anti-Trump |
| 3 | Al JazeeraQatar 76 pro-Palestinian |
| 4 | France 24France 76 anti-Trump |
| 5 | The GuardianUK 76 anti-Trump |
| 6 | Sky NewsUK 75 anti-Trump |
| 7 | Le MondeFrance 74 anti-Trump |
| 8 | NDTVIndia 74 pro-government |
| 9 | CNNUS 74 pro-product/pro-consumer spending |
| 10 | New York TimesUS 73 anti-Trump |
| 11 | Fox NewsUS 71 anti-immigration |
| 12 | El PaísSpain 70 anti-Trump |
| 13 | Washington PostUS 70 pro-Palestinian |
| 14 | RTRussia 64 anti-Trump |
How scores work: Each article is scored 0–100. Headline language, framing, and factuality account for 75% of the score; lead image analysis (emotional manipulation, sensationalism) accounts for 25%. On topic pages, each channel also shows its directional lean — the perspective its headlines most frequently favor (e.g. “pro-Palestinian”, “pro-government”). A ⚠ Coverage Bias alert appears when a channel both over-covers a topic (2×+ the peer average) and scores below 40/100. Learn more →
Disclaimer: All scores and labels are generated by AI and may be inaccurate. Analysis quality improves over time as more data is collected and models are refined. Scores should be used as a general guide, not as definitive judgments of journalistic quality.